Enterprise integrations that build themselves
masterVantage is an integration engine. It works out what your data actually means and builds the integration from that, with no mapping written by hand. When a connected system changes shape, it re-maps itself. Your engineers stop maintaining connections and go back to building.
These are examples, not a list of supported systems. The engine works from the data it is pointed at, so anything with a readable schema or a readable file is in scope.
As strings, KUNNR and AccountNumber have nothing in common. What they do have in common is the only thing that survives a rename.
Every other option on your shortlist sells you tooling
You get connectors, a canvas and a mapping interface. Today your people still write every mapping by hand, and still maintain it for as long as the system is in use. That maintenance is the part we take off you.
| Traditional iPaaS | Systems integrator | masterVantage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who builds the mapping | Your engineers, by hand | Their consultants, billed by the day | The engine, from the data itself |
| Time to stand the platform up | Weeks, plus procurement | A quarter, after scoping | Weeks, in your own environment |
| Time to each integration after that | Weeks to months, every time | A new statement of work, every time | A working session |
| When a source schema changes | Pipeline halts, ticket, developer | Change request, new statement of work | Re-mapped automatically, logged |
| Cost curve over three years | Rises with every system you add | Rises with every change you request | Flat. Maintenance is the engine's job |
| Where your data goes | Through their cloud | Wherever the project put it | Nowhere. The engine runs inside your perimeter |
| What you are buying | A platform, plus the people to run it | Hours | The outcome, on a fixed annual licence |
You are not ripping anything out
You have an integration platform with years of work on it. Nobody is proposing you replace it.
masterVantage runs alongside what you already have. It is deployed into your environment as a separate set of containers and connects to the systems you point it at. Your existing platform keeps running exactly as it does today.
So the first decision is small. Pick the three or five connections that break most often, cost the most to maintain, or are blocking something you want to ship. Put those on masterVantage. Leave the rest alone.
If it works, you move more across when contracts come up for renewal. If it does not, you have spent a pilot budget instead of committing to a migration.
- The connection that broke twice this year. The one with a named owner who dreads the vendor release notes.
- The migration you keep postponing. An ERP move where re-mapping is the reason the date slips.
- The system nobody will touch. Legacy, flat files, the person who understood it has left.
- The duplicate record problem. Two systems holding the same customer under different names.
One fixed annual licence. Unlimited use.
There is no per-integration fee, no per-connector charge and no metering by record or token. Whether you build one integration or four hundred, the number stays the same.
Included in the licence
- The engine. All container images: classification services, graph store, routing services.
- The models. Delivered in the containers and run on your hardware. No external API, no token bill.
- Unlimited integrations and volume. No counting, no tiers to graduate through.
- Updates. Lightweight, applied without disrupting live operations.
You provide
- The infrastructure. Hosts, memory, storage and GPU, sized to your data volume. Specifications are on the technical page.
- The graph database licence. It ships in the containers, but the licence is yours and sits outside our fee. The free edition runs a single instance; the commercial edition adds clustering, online backup and role-based access control.
- Network access. Secure paths from the engine to the systems it connects.
- Your people, briefly. Approvals on anything below your confidence threshold.
The model is fixed rather than metered for a practical reason. The engine runs inside your infrastructure and we have no access to it, so we cannot see how many integrations you build or how much data moves through them. Charging by usage would mean watching you work, and the architecture is specifically designed to make that impossible.
A vendor ships a minor update
One field gets renamed. Here is how that Tuesday goes, with us and without.
Traditional iPaaS or hand-coded pipeline
- 09:14vendor updates source schema
- 09:14mapping not found · pipeline halted
- 09:14downstream records stop arriving
- 11:40alert triaged, ticket raised
- Day 2developer assigned, root cause found
- Day 4mapping repaired, backlog replayed
masterVantage
- 09:14vendor updates source schema
- 09:14change detected on source
- 09:14field re-interpreted · confidence 0.97
- 09:14mapping updated and written to audit log
- 09:14pipeline running · no records lost
- 09:14no ticket raised, no developer paged
Most of what an integration team spends its year on is this loop, running across hundreds of connections. That loop is the thing we remove.
You decide where autonomy stops
Set the confidence threshold. Everything above it applies automatically. Everything below it waits for a person. Move the slider.
At 1.00, nothing is applied until someone approves it. Lower it and more runs on its own. Whatever you pick, every decision is written to the log with what made it, and can be undone.
It runs on your side of the firewall
The engine is deployed in containers inside your environment. Your data has no outbound path, which is a property of how it is built rather than a promise we are making.
We hold no copy of your data, your schemas or your history. If we disappeared tomorrow the engine in your environment would keep running, and source code escrow can be written into your contract so you could keep developing it.
That matters most in banking, healthcare, public sector and defence, where data residency is not something anyone can negotiate away.
The questions we get
You are an early-stage company. What happens to us if you fail?
A fair question and we would rather answer it than wait for procurement to raise it. Two things protect you. The engine runs inside your own infrastructure with no dependency on us, so nothing stops working if we do. And we will put source code escrow into the contract if you want it, which means that on defined events such as insolvency you get the source and can continue running and developing the platform yourself. Ask for it during negotiation and we will agree to it.
How is it priced?
A fixed annual licence covering unlimited integrations and unlimited volume. No per-integration, per-connector, per-record or per-token charges. You supply and pay for the infrastructure it runs on. We give you the figure on the first call.
Do we have to replace our existing integration platform?
No, and we would advise against trying. masterVantage deploys alongside what you have. Start with the few connections that cost you the most, and move more across only if it earns it.
What happens when it gets something wrong?
Every generated mapping carries a confidence score. Below your threshold it stops and asks. Above it, it proceeds and writes the decision to the audit log. Nothing is irreversible and nothing is hidden.
Does our data go to an LLM?
No. The engine runs entirely inside your infrastructure. No data is transmitted to external model providers, and none is transmitted to us. We have no access to your systems, your schemas or your history.
How is this different from the iPaaS we already pay for?
An iPaaS gives you connectors and a canvas, and your team builds and maintains the mappings on top of it. masterVantage generates the mapping and keeps it working. Connectors were never the expensive part of integration; maintaining the mappings is where the budget goes.
What does deployment actually involve, and how long does it take?
Linux hosts you provision, Docker Engine and Compose or Kubernetes, our container images from a secure registry, and credentials for the systems you want connected. No architecture change, no data migration, and no new public endpoint. A typical environment goes from initial connection to live operations in weeks. Integrations built after that take a working session. Full specifications are on the technical page.
What can it connect?
Anything reachable from inside your network: REST and SOAP APIs, relational databases, ERP and CRM platforms, and legacy systems with file or message-based interfaces. Bring us the pair you care about and we will tell you plainly whether it fits.
What stage is the company at?
We are early and there is no point pretending otherwise. Small team, product in paid production use today. In practice that means you deal directly with the people who built the engine and your problem gets more attention than a large vendor would give it. If your procurement process needs a supplier with a thousand references, we are not there yet.
Bring us the integration you have rebuilt three times
We will build it during the session using your systems and your field structures, including the parts where the engine stops and asks someone to decide.
We reply within one business day. The first conversation is with the people who built the engine, not a sales rep.
Request received
We will come back within one business day with a time, and a short note on how we would approach what you described.